Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tory M Blue
Subject Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Date
Msg-id 8a547c840910172108o366058acv2df4f6ed2015ddc1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Responses Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Tree view

Torsten Zühlsdorff wrote:

>
> I've upgraded all my databases to 8.4. They pain was not so big, the
> new -j Parameter from pg_restore is fantastic. I really like the new
> functions around Pl/PGSQL. All is stable and fast.
>
> Greetings from Germany,
> Torsten

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:55 PM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
I am running all my production work on 8.4 at this point; no problems of
note.

-- Karl

Thanks guys, ya running slon , must be replicated so it seems 8.4 is good, but need to wait for the slon+pg to be good..

Also not real pain? A full dump and restore again, can't see that not being painful for a DB of any real size.

Thanks for the response guys.

Und Danke Torsten :)

Tory

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?
Next
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: Are folks running 8.4 in production environments? and 8.4 and slon 1.2?