Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernd Helmle
Subject Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 8FEB44AF6599316421E487F7@amenophis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem
List pgsql-hackers

--On 20. Februar 2011 09:32:02 -0500 Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> Well, I figure it will be hard to allow larger maximums, but can we make
> the GUC variable maximums be more realistic?  Right now it is
> MAX_KILOBYTES (INT_MAX).

This is something i proposed some time ago, too. At least, it will stop us 
from promising something which is maintenance_work_mem not able to deliver.

-- 
Thanks
Bernd


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: work_mem / maintenance_work_mem maximums
Next
From: Bernd Helmle
Date:
Subject: Re: using a lot of maintenance_work_mem