> The reason I'm inclined to question this is that what we want
> is not an fsync per write but an fsync per transaction, and we can't
> easily buffer all of a transaction's XLOG writes...
WAL keeps records in WAL buffers (wal-buffers parameter may be used to
increase # of buffers), so we can make write()-s buffered.
Seems that my Solaris has fdatasync, so I'll test different approaches...
Vadim
