RE: xlog_bufmgr - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: xlog_bufmgr
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A234D31B6@sectorbase1.sectorbase.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to xlog_bufmgr  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: RE: xlog_bufmgr  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Would it be OK now to eliminate the separate xlog_bufmgr.c and
> xlog_localbuf.c files, folding that code back into bufmgr.c and
> localbuf.c?  It's a real pain to have to make parallel updates
> in two copies of that code...

Yes, it's OK now. I'll remove #ifdef XLOG in other files soon.

Vadim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: xlog_bufmgr
Next
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: LOCK Fixes/Break on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE