RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mikheev, Vadim
Subject RE: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
Date
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018D54@SECTORBASE1
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Possible performance improvement: buffer replacemen t policy
List pgsql-hackers
> > It looks like it wouldn't take too much work to replace 
> > shared buffers on the basis of LRU-2 instead of LRU, so
> > I'm thinking about trying it.
> > 
> > Has anyone looked into this area?  Is there a better method to try?
> 
> Sounds like a perfect idea.  Good luck.  :-)

Hmm, how much time will be required?
I integrate WAL right now and have to do significant changes
in bufmgr...

Vadim




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Per Hedeland
Date:
Subject: Re: getting local domain to get attached through sendmail ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: The lightbulb just went on...