Re: ANALYZE patch for review - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject Re: ANALYZE patch for review
Date
Msg-id 8F4A22E017460A458DB7BBAB65CA6AE5026596@openmanage
Whole thread Raw
In response to ANALYZE patch for review  ("Mark Cave-Ayland" <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk>)
Responses Re: ANALYZE patch for review
List pgsql-patches
Hi Tom,

Having been working with the PostGIS team to implement a custom analyze
routine for R-Tree selectivity, we have a question regarding the new
vacuum_delay_point() which is present in analyze.c. Is it the
responsibility of the programmers to remember to do a
vacuum_delay_point() before calling the fetch_func(), or would it be
better to move the vacuum_delay_point() into std_fetch_func()? It would
seem to make more sense that the throttling is done by PostgreSQL rather
than requiring programmers to have to remember to include the extra
function call before calling the fetch_func() themselves.


Many thanks,

Mark.

---

Mark Cave-Ayland
Webbased Ltd.
Tamar Science Park
Derriford
Plymouth
PL6 8BX
England

Tel: +44 (0)1752 764445
Fax: +44 (0)1752 764446


This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You
should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute
its contents to any other person.




pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Improvement to random regression test
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: remove log_timestamp, log_pid and log_source_port GUC