Re: The ..... worm - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Mark Cave-Ayland |
---|---|
Subject | Re: The ..... worm |
Date | |
Msg-id | 8F4A22E017460A458DB7BBAB65CA6AE50264DD@webbased9 Whole thread Raw |
In response to | The ..... worm (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>) |
Responses |
Re: The ..... worm
|
List | pgsql-general |
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:40:28 -0400 > From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> > To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> > Cc: expect <expect@ihubbell.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: The ..... worm > Message-ID: <20030828054028.GE7382@dcc.uchile.cl> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:17:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > expect <expect@ihubbell.com> writes: > > > Other lists I subscribe to do not suffer from the spam plague in the > > > way this list does. I wish I'd known that before signing on rather > > > than after. > > > > [ raised eyebrow ] I subscribe to many mailing lists. On most of the > > other lists I have to apply spam filtering to what arrives, but the PG > > lists are very nearly spam-free (thanks to Marc's hard work). I dunno > > what you are complaining about. > > It is a valid complaint. The fact was that the archives (at least on > archives.postgresql.org) kept the email addresses verbatim, right in front of the eyes > > of any spammer's web crawler. > > Fortunately, Cristoph Dalitz's repeated complaints have finally caused Marc to > reconfigure MHonArc so it won't publish the addresses. Hi everyone, While we are still on this topic, can I put in another request? What I didn't realise when I joined the postgresql mailing lists is that emails to the mailing lists are sent to usenet comp.databases.postgresql.* WITHOUT obfuscation/removal of email addresses. While I am happy for my email address to be visible to private members of a mailing list, I wasn't aware until after I had posted to the list and the spam started trickling in that the email address was available publically on usenet :(. Mark, would it cause anyone any great problems if posts gated onto the newsgroups had their email addresses removed, and would this be possible? I can't see that it would cause anybody any problems since casual readers could then still read/post to the group, and anyone involved with any of the postgresql lists long enough for this to be a problem would probably end up subscribing via email anyway. Anyone else have any feelings on this? I know it's too late for most of us but it might help some newbies... Cheers, Mark. -- Mark Cave-Ayland Webbased Ltd. Tamar Science Park Derriford Plymouth PL6 8BX England Tel: +44 (0)1752 764445 Fax: +44 (0)1752 764446 This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person.
pgsql-general by date: