Re: The ..... worm - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject Re: The ..... worm
Date
Msg-id 8F4A22E017460A458DB7BBAB65CA6AE50264DD@webbased9
Whole thread Raw
In response to The ..... worm  (Dennis Gearon <gearond@fireserve.net>)
Responses Re: The ..... worm
List pgsql-general
> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:40:28 -0400
> From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>
> To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Cc: expect <expect@ihubbell.com>, pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: The ..... worm
> Message-ID: <20030828054028.GE7382@dcc.uchile.cl>
>
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 12:17:21AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > expect <expect@ihubbell.com> writes:
> > > Other lists I subscribe to do not suffer from the spam plague in
the
> > > way this list does.  I wish I'd known that before signing on
rather
> > > than after.
> >
> > [ raised eyebrow ]  I subscribe to many mailing lists.  On most of
the
> > other lists I have to apply spam filtering to what arrives, but the
PG
> > lists are very nearly spam-free (thanks to Marc's hard work).  I
dunno
> > what you are complaining about.
>
> It is a valid complaint.  The fact was that the archives (at least on
> archives.postgresql.org) kept the email addresses verbatim, right in
front of the eyes > > of any spammer's web crawler.
>
> Fortunately, Cristoph Dalitz's repeated complaints have finally caused
Marc to
> reconfigure MHonArc so it won't publish the addresses.


Hi everyone,

While we are still on this topic, can I put in another request? What I
didn't realise when I joined the postgresql mailing lists is that emails
to the mailing lists are sent to usenet comp.databases.postgresql.*
WITHOUT obfuscation/removal of email addresses. While I am happy for my
email address to be visible to private members of a mailing list, I
wasn't aware until after I had posted to the list and the spam started
trickling in that the email address was available publically on usenet
:(.

Mark, would it cause anyone any great problems if posts gated onto the
newsgroups had their email addresses removed, and would this be
possible? I can't see that it would cause anybody any problems since
casual readers could then still read/post to the group, and anyone
involved with any of the postgresql lists long enough for this to be a
problem would probably end up subscribing via email anyway. Anyone else
have any feelings on this? I know it's too late for most of us but it
might help some newbies...


Cheers,

Mark.

--

Mark Cave-Ayland
Webbased Ltd.
Tamar Science Park
Derriford
Plymouth
PL6 8BX
England

Tel: +44 (0)1752 764445
Fax: +44 (0)1752 764446


This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You
should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute
its contents to any other person.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding header nam to any table
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Question about conccurrency control and Insert