> On 20 Feb 2022, at 02:38, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Back to this patch: assuming we can settle on a good-enough-for-now
> replacement algorithm, do we want to add this set of 7 GUCs? Does
> anyone else want to weigh in on that?
Hi Thomas!
It seems we don't have any other input besides reviews and Andres's -0.2.
Is there a chance to proceed?
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
