On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:23 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I believe the point David is trying to make is that someone might take
> an 9.2 version of a contrib module and manually install it on an 8.4
> server by executing the install script, perhaps with some amount of
> hackery.
Right.
> But I don't think we're required to support that case. If the user
> does a non-standard install, it's their job to deal with the fallout.
Agreed; I was thinking of how one would handle this for non-core distributed extensions. Probably not necessary for
contrib.
David