Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length) - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Rui DeSousa
Subject Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)
Date
Msg-id 8EC9D082-B541-435F-9EE3-3ED14AA3C2D1@crazybean.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)  (raf <raf@raf.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)  (raf <raf@raf.org>)
List pgsql-admin


On Apr 28, 2020, at 7:43 PM, raf <raf@raf.org> wrote:

I just use "text" for everything. It's less typing. :-)


Ugh, I see it as sign that the designers of the schema didn’t fully think about the actual requirements or care about them and it usually shows.    

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: raf
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL CHARACTER VARYING vs CHARACTER VARYING (Length)