Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Mark Dilger
Subject Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel
Date
Msg-id 8EC873C1-8102-4055-97BF-13F7D81F29DE@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers

> On Oct 9, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> 
> In-Reply-To: <20180928223240.kgwc4czzzekrpsid@alap3.anarazel.de>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As discussed below (at [1]), I think we should remove $subject.  I plan
> to do so, unless somebody protests soon-ish.  I thought it'd be better
> to call attention to this in a new thread, to make sure people had a
> chance to object.

I have no objection, but I'm curious, when retiring a datatype and
associated functions, do the Oids that were assigned to them become
available for new uses, or do you have to expire them to avoid breaking
pg_upgrade and such?  Retiring built-in types and functions seems
rare enough that I've not seen how this is handled before.

mark




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Speeding up INSERTs and UPDATEs to partitioned tables
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] removing abstime, reltime, tinterval.c, spi/timetravel