Re: On login trigger: take three - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: On login trigger: take three
Date
Msg-id 8EB8332F-8708-4E00-B2BF-DF7D91F09A6F@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: On login trigger: take three  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 6 Mar 2023, at 23:10, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-03-06 15:55:01 -0500, Gregory Stark (as CFM) wrote:
>> It looks like Daniel Gustafsson, Andres, and Tom have all weighed in
>> on this patch with at least a neutral comment (+-0 from Andres :)
>>
>> It looks like the main concern was breaking physical replicas and that
>> there was consensus that as long as single-user mode worked that it
>> was ok?
>
> I don't think it's OK with just single user mode as an scape hatch. We need
> the GUC that was discussed as part of the thread (and I think there's a patch
> for that too).

This is the patch which originated from this thread:

    https://commitfest.postgresql.org/42/4013/

--
Daniel Gustafsson




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: On login trigger: take three
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Use pg_pwritev_with_retry() instead of write() in dir_open_for_write() to avoid partial writes?