Re: MVCC performance issue - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kyriacos Kyriacou
Subject Re: MVCC performance issue
Date
Msg-id 8BCBF9DB739F034B87FE7C7D30EAE55C279F0552@hqex2k.francoudi.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to MVCC performance issue  ("Kyriacos Kyriacou" <kyriacosk@prime-tel.com>)
List pgsql-performance
To be honest I just now read about HOT (Heap Overflow Tuple) and it
seems that will help a lot. Thanks for your point.

Kyriacos

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Marshall [mailto:ktm@rice.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 6:22 PM
To: Kyriacos Kyriacou
Cc: Thom Brown; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] MVCC performance issue

Ah, this is a very old version. If you can take advantage of
a version with HOT support, you should be much, much happier.

Cheers,
Ken

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 06:14:00PM +0200, Kyriacos Kyriacou wrote:
>
>
> We are still using PostgreSQL 8.2.4. We are running a 24x7 system and
> database size is over 200Gb so upgrade is not an easy decision!
>
> I have it in my plans so in next few months I will setup new servers
and
> upgrade to version 9.
>
>
> >> Which version of PostgreSQL are you basing this on?
>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Thom Brown
> >>Twitter: @darkixion
> >>IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
> >>Registered Linux user: #516935
>



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: anti-join chosen even when slower than old plan