You're right. I meant the manual. And I agree. It is well written for its audience.
But my reference to object- relational was just intended as an example of what you DB professionals live with day in
andday out.but we, the great unwashed, do find it difficult to get started.
Citing individual successes misses the point. The success of MySQL, FileMaker, Access et al proves that there is a big
marketopportunity being missed.
No, those applications don't interest the experts but it adds indirectly to the overall success of the product.
I wonder what percentage of developers started out with Access.
Rob Napier
On 08/08/2012, at 8:19 AM, Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net> wrote:
> Rob Napier wrote on 07.08.2012 23:45:
>> And I found the wiki documentation really easy to follow, up to the point
>> when it starts to jump into object-relational blah blah blah.
>
> Why the wiki and not the "real" manual? I find it (the manual) at least as easy to read as
> the MySQL manual (in fact I find it better structured than MySQL's manual)
>
> The manual hardly ever talks about "object relational" stuff. Only where
> table inheritance is documented and for partitioning (which is using
> table inheritance).
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy
>
