Re: Postgresql not using an index - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gregory Williamson
Subject Re: Postgresql not using an index
Date
Msg-id 8B319E5A30FF4A48BE7EEAAF609DB233021F30F3@COMAIL01.digitalglobe.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgresql not using an index  (Marc Cuypers <m.cuypers@mgvd.be>)
List pgsql-general

Marc --

> Hi,
>
> I'm using postgres 7.4 and bacula 1.38 on debian.
>
> In the bacula database there is a table named 'file' which has about 2.5
> million rows.
> In this table there is a field 'jobid' which is indexed.
> The index is created with the following command:
>       CREATE INDEX file_jobid_idx  ON file  USING btree  (jobid);
>
> The query:
>       SELECT * from file where jobid=2792
>
> does a full scan and to my opinion it doesn't use the index.
> I already did a VACUUM ANALYZE on the database.
>
> Somebody an idea?
>
> EXPLAIN tells the following:
> Seq Scan on file  (cost=0.00..707683.30 rows=207562 width=110) (actual
> time=103215.145..161153.664 rows=1 loops=1)
>    Filter: (jobid = 2792)
> Total runtime: 161154.734 ms

Perhaps jobid is not an int -- maybe a bigint ? In which case the types don't match and the index won't be used (newer versions might do ok but 7.4 won't IIRC).

Perhaps we could see the table description from \d in the psql tool ?

HTH,

Greg Williamson
Senior DBA
DigitalGlobe

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

(My corporate masters made me say this.)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql not using an index
Next
From: Marc Cuypers
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql not using an index