> On 2 Dec 2025, at 08:32, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Simple example I have seen in the past: a Relation argument not used
> (I think there has been at least one such example in tablecmds.c,
> whatever). Removing this argument also meant that we don't require
> function callers to open a Relation, removing the need to think about
> the lock it would require at open.
I think this is the really interesting case and the angle to focus on. If we
can simplify callers to perhaps even avoid locks then that's a stronger case
when considering potential API breaks. It might still be more value in not
breaking API, but that would have to be considered on a case by case basis.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
