On 2/16/24 02:35, shihao zhong wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:08 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 05:36:36PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> You've indeed grabbed some historical inconsistencies here. Please
>>> note that your patch has reversed diffs (for example, the SQL
>>> definition of pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea uses bytea,text,text as arguments
>>> and your resulting patch shows how HEAD does the job with
>>> bytea,bytea,bytea), but perhaps you have generated it with a command
>>> like `git diff -R`?
>>
>> The reversed part of the patch put aside aside, I've double-checked
>> your patch and the inconsistencies seem to be all addressed in this
>> area.
> Thanks for fixing and merging this patch, I appreciate it!
>
Should this be marked as committed, or is there some remaining part?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company