Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jonathan Jacobson
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64
Date
Msg-id 89b93624-c19c-f942-71cc-4f3dc62249a7@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 10beta1 sequence regression failure on sparc64  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christoph, what beta2 change was it that fixed that problem?

I'm having exactly the same regression test failure in version 10.1 (not beta) running on Solaris 9

Compiler used: GCC 4.6.4
CFLAGS: -O2 -m64


On 13/07/2017 20:05, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: To Andres Freund 2017-05-24 <20170524170921.7pykzbt54dlfktdr@msg.df7cb.de>
>>>> If we had a typo or something in that code, the build farm should have
>>>> caught it by now.
>>>>
>>>> I would try compiling with lower -O and see what happens.
>>> Trying -O0 now.
>> Sorry for the late reply, I was hoping to catch you on IRC, but then
>> didn't manage to be around at a time that would fit the timezone
>> shift.
>>
>> The -O0 build passed the regression tests. Not sure what that means
>> for our problem, though.
> Fwiw, the problem is fixed with beta2, even with -O2:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=postgresql-10&arch=sparc64
>
> Christoph
>
>



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Patch] Log SSL certificate verification errors
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning