Re: SSDD reliability - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Ribe
Subject Re: SSDD reliability
Date
Msg-id 89C26BB4-B1A2-437C-855A-C3A24D3D9CEF@elevated-dev.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SSDD reliability  (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>)
List pgsql-general
On May 4, 2011, at 11:31 AM, David Boreham wrote:

> To be honest, like the article author, I'd be happy with 300+ days to failure, IF the drives provide an accurate
predictorof impending doom. 

No problem with that, for a first step. ***BUT*** the failures in this article and many others I've read about are not
inhigh-write db workloads, so they're not write wear, they're just crappy electronics failing. 

--
Scott Ribe
scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: auto-reconnect: temp schemas, sequences, transactions
Next
From: durumdara
Date:
Subject: ZEOS or PGDAC - How to lock a resource?