Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
> On 01/23/2014 09:18 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> it seems that this commit made spoonbill an unhappy animal:
>> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=spoonbill&dt=2014-01-23%2000%3A00%3A04
> Hmm, all the Sparcs. Some kind of an alignment issue, perhaps? I will
> investigate..
My HPUX box, which is also picky about alignment, is unhappy as well.
It's crashing here:
ginPostingListDecode (plist=0xc39efac1, ndecoded=0x7b03bee0) at ginpostinglist.c:263
263 return ginPostingListDecodeAllSegments(plist,
(gdb) bt
#0 ginPostingListDecode (plist=0xc39efac1, ndecoded=0x7b03bee0) at ginpostinglist.c:263
#1 0x205308 in ginReadTuple (ginstate=0xc39efac1, attnum=48864, itup=0x7b03bee0, nitems=0x403ee9a4) at
ginentrypage.c:170
#2 0x21074c in startScanEntry (ginstate=0x403ec3ac, entry=0x403ee970) at ginget.c:463
#3 0x21086c in startScan (scan=0xc39efac1) at ginget.c:493
#4 0x212c14 in gingetbitmap (fcinfo=0xc39efac1) at ginget.c:1531
#5 0x5ffc50 in FunctionCall2Coll (flinfo=0xc39efac1, collation=2063843040, arg1=2063843040, arg2=1077864868) at
fmgr.c:1323
#6 0x24ee5c in index_getbitmap (scan=0x40163878, bitmap=0x403ee620) at indexam.c:649
#7 0x3b9430 in MultiExecBitmapIndexScan (node=0x40163768) at nodeBitmapIndexscan.c:89
#8 0x3a5a3c in MultiExecProcNode (node=0x40163768) at execProcnode.c:562
#9 0x3b8610 in BitmapHeapNext (node=0x401628f0) at nodeBitmapHeapscan.c:104
#10 0x3ae5b0 in ExecScan (node=0x401628f0, accessMtd=0x4001a2c2 <DINFINITY+3802>, recheckMtd=0x4001a2ca
<DINFINITY+3810>)at execScan.c:82
#11 0x3b8e9c in ExecBitmapHeapScan (node=0xc39efac1) at nodeBitmapHeapscan.c:441
#12 0x3a56e0 in ExecProcNode (node=0x401628f0) at execProcnode.c:414
...
(gdb) p debug_query_string
$1 = 0x4006d4a8 "SELECT * FROM array_index_op_test WHERE i <@ '{38,34,32,89}' ORDER BY seqno;"
The problem appears to be due to the misaligned "plist" pointer
(0xc39efac1 here).
regards, tom lane
