Re: BUG #4921: ltree @> ltree[] operator shouldn't fail if ltree[] is empty - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: BUG #4921: ltree @> ltree[] operator shouldn't fail if ltree[] is empty
Date
Msg-id 8992.1267030089@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #4921: ltree @> ltree[] operator shouldn't fail if ltree[] is empty  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: BUG #4921: ltree @> ltree[] operator shouldn't fail if ltree[] is empty  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I can see two reasonable ways to address this:
>>>
>>> * Change the ltree test to reject only ARR_NDIM > 1.
>>>
>>> * Drop the ARR_NDIM check altogether, and let it search any sort of
>>> array.
>>>
>>> I'm leaning to #2 myself.  However, there are probably other places with
>>> the same kind of issue, and in some of them it might make more sense to
>>> reject multidimensional arrays.
>>
>> Thoughts?

> Do something.  ;-)  LOL

I'll drop the check then.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Lou Picciano
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required?