Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty
Date
Msg-id 8975.1426611115@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: ranlib bleating about dirmod.o being empty  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> It looks like ar isn't even the preferred method to build static
> libraries on OS X anymore.  Instead, one should use libtool (not GNU
> libtool), which has a -no_warning_for_no_symbols option.

I looked into this a little bit, but that option seems to be a somewhat
recent innovation; at least the libtool on my 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
buildfarm critter doesn't recognize it.  We might be able to adopt it
in a couple more years when nobody cares about such old OS X releases.
In the meantime, though, reclassifying dirmod.o solves the problem
so I don't feel a need to have an argument about dropping support for
old releases.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit