Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date
Msg-id 897.1079969956@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
>> Well, seems like what you have to do is leave it as relation_expr
>> as far as bison is concerned, but test in the C-code action and error
>> out if "*" was specified.  (Accepting ONLY seems alright to me.)

> Actually, it occurs to me that the SET WITHOUT CLUSTER form CAN recurse. 
>    Should I make it do that, even though the CLUSTER ON form cannot?

Seems like more work than it's really worth ... but if you wanna ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum next steps
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_autovacuum next steps