Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl
Date
Msg-id 8963.1164049781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [PATCHES] WIP 2 interpreters for plperl  ("Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Since this is a behaviour modification, do we want to apply it to the 
>> back branches? Doing so would certainly be possible, although it would 
>> be non-trivial.

> I have committed this to HEAD at any rate, so that we can get some 
> buildfarm testing going.

My vote is to leave it just in HEAD; there may be someone out there
depending on plperl and plperlu being in the same interpreter, and
breaking their code in a minor release doesn't seem very friendly.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Further MSVC build updates
Next
From: "Heikki Linnakangas"
Date:
Subject: Re: XA support (distributed transactions)