Re: unconstify equivalent for volatile - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 18/02/2019 16:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Umm ... wouldn't this amount to papering over actual bugs?

> I'd argue that it's not making it easier to do but rather easier to spot
> (vs normal type casting) which is IMO a good thing from patch review
> perspective.

Yeah, fair point.  As Peter noted about unconstify, these could be
viewed as TODO markers.

            regards, tom lane