Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alexander Staubo
Subject Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion
Date
Msg-id 88daf38c0907090939l68cd97dak38360473e6ffd9e8@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sorting by an arbitrary criterion  (Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Craig James<craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:
> Suppose I have a large table with a small-cardinality CATEGORY column (say,
> categories 1..5).  I need to sort by an arbitrary (i.e. user-specified)
> mapping of CATEGORY, something like this:
>
>  1 => 'z'
>  2 => 'a'
>  3 => 'b'
>  4 => 'w'
>  5 => 'h'
>
> So when I get done, the sort order should be 2,3,5,4,1.

If the object is to avoid a separate table, you can do it with a
"case" statement:

  select ... from ...
  order by case category
    when 1 then 'z'
    when 2 then 'a'
    when 3 then 'b'
    when 4 then 'w'
    when 5 then 'h'
  end

If you this sounds slow, you're right. But it might perform well
enough for your use case.

A.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sorting by an arbitrary criterion
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Huge difference in query performance between 8.3 and 8.4 (possibly)