Re: Slightly OT. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alexander Staubo
Subject Re: Slightly OT.
Date
Msg-id 88daf38c0706011644o1852e0bdqa0fdc4072508abfa@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Slightly OT.  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Slightly OT.  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 6/2/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> Here is some work going on that looks like what you want:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00050.php

I had no idea someone was working on WAL-log-based replication; I saw
the TODO entry a while ago, but I missed the thread. I think WAL
replication is a beautiful idea, so I'll gladly throw my support
behind this. Thanks for the pointer.

> You might also seriously consider PgPool-II.

pgpool-II seems like a decent idea. I'm not sure if the partitioning
can support referential integrity though -- would they have to be
declared as CHECK constraints that used dblink()?

Also, it doesn't seem capable of planning a query intelligently, which
means that a query such as "select * from foo where id = 123" is going
to be aggregated across all nodes even though only one node has the
partition covering the id range [0, 1000], say.

Alexander.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: One last Slony question (was Re: Slightly OT.)
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: One last Slony question (was Re: Slightly OT.)