From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
>> ... I think
>> MauMau's original bind_textdomain_codeset() proposal was on the right
>> track.
>
> It might well be. My objection was to the proposal for back-patching it
> when we have little idea of the possible side-effects. I would be fine
> with handling that as a 9.4-only patch (preferably with the usual review
> process).
> Still, libc is certainly the source of the vast majority of
> potentially-translated messages that we might be passing through to users,
> so fixing it would be a step forward.
We are using 9.1/9.2 and 9.2 is probably dominant, so I would be relieved
with either of the following choices:
1. Take the approach that doesn't use bind_textdomain_codeset("libc") (i.e.
the second version of errno_str.patch) for 9.4 and older releases.
2. Use bind_textdomain_codeset("libc") (i.e. take strerror_codeset.patch)
for 9.4, and take the non-bind_textdomain_codeset approach for older
releases.
Regards
MauMau
