Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com> writes:
> On 11/4/2004 5:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> autovacuum would probably be a reasonable place to put it. We don't
>> currently have any good way for autovacuum to get at the information,
>> but I suppose that an integrated autovacuum daemon could do so.
> Don't know why this must be an "integrated" autovacuum. Can't the info
> about the FSM usage be presented as system views?
No doubt, but that's not free either --- it'd still need supporting
code in the backend.
regards, tom lane
