AW: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Färber, Franz-Josef (StMUK)
Subject AW: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Date
Msg-id 886a7a1fb54a4abdbb89897a6854edd7@stmuk.bayern.de
Whole thread
In response to Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Responses Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Re: AW: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
List pgsql-general
Are you sure the extension pgtt would work in my case?

https://github.com/darold/pgtt#how-the-extension-really-works says:

"the first access to the table using a SELECT, UPDATE or DELETE statement will produce the creation of a temporary
table"

Well, my original point was: Creation of a temporary table is prohibited due to "security-restricted operation".


Regards,
Franz-Josef Färber


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> 
Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Oktober 2026 16:55
An: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>; pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Betreff: Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?

On 10/2/26 3:19 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 8:35 PM David G. Johnston 
> <david.g.johnston@gmail.com <mailto:david.g.johnston@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On Thu, Oct 1, 2026 at 4:56 PM Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com
>     <mailto:ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>         A GLOBAL TEMP table (where the DBA runs the CREATE GLOBAL TEMP
>         TABLE once (so that CREATE TEMP TABLE some_table  everywhere
>         that my_func() is called) would also solve OP's problem.
> 
> 
>     Per the create table docs:
> 
>     "Optionally, GLOBAL or LOCAL can be written before TEMPORARY or
>     TEMP. This presently makes no difference in PostgreSQL and is
>     deprecated; see Compatibility below."
> 
> And I'm praying for "since future versions of PostgreSQLmight adopt a 
> more standard-compliant interpretation of their meaning" in the 
> Compatibility section you referenced.

As an extension there is:

https://github.com/darold/pgtt

> 
> --
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thiemo Kellner
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?
Next
From: Karsten Hilbert
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is materialized view creation a "security-restricted operation"?