Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases ( - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Date
Msg-id 87zmo2pmas.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (  (Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
List pgsql-performance
Joshua Marsh <icub3d@gmail.com> writes:

> We all want our systems to be CPU bound, but it's not always possible.
> Remember, he is managing a 5 TB Databse. That's quite a bit different than a
> 100 GB or even 500 GB database.

Ok, a more productive point: it's not really the size of the database that
controls whether you're I/O bound or CPU bound. It's the available I/O
bandwidth versus your CPU speed.

If your I/O subsystem can feed data to your CPU as fast as it can consume it
then you'll be CPU bound no matter how much data you have in total. It's
harder to scale up I/O subsystems than CPUs, instead of just replacing a CPU
it tends to mean replacing the whole system to get a better motherboard with a
faster, better bus, as well as adding more controllers and more disks.

--
greg

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware/OS recommendations for large databases (
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Perl DBD and an alarming problem