Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitri Fontaine
Subject Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?
Date
Msg-id 87zl2hbxy6.fsf@hi-media-techno.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: machine-readable pg_controldata?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>  I have not bothered to start a pgfoundry project yet -- thoughts?

For the visibility of the project, pgfoundry is still a good idea it
seems, even if you still have to register separately for the online
catalogue: http://www.postgresql.org/download/products/1

Now, AFAIUI, if you want to ease the porting of the pgfoundry platform
to something else, the best is not to use much of the features there (if
any), but host the project at github or google code or whatever, and
link from pgfoundry.

For example, I've been switching the code hosting of my extensions from
pgfoundry to github for some time now (switching as soon as maintenance
is needed, git cvsimport is all I need to migrate).

Regards,
-- 
dim


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: lock mode for ControlFileLock which pg_start_backup uses
Next
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG, two varchars with same name on same line