peter_e@gmx.net (Peter Eisentraut) writes:
> In general, I think the more efficient way to address this overall
> problem is to run the resulting HTML through tidy and be done with it.
+1. I use similar toolchain for my own web site, and one of the steps
is to run tidy on the output, which rectifies a number of issues. (I
haven't looked at just what they are in some years now :-))
--
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/slony.html
No lusers were harmed in the creation of this usenet article. AND I
WANT TO KNOW WHY NOT!
-- glmar0@twirl.mcc.ac.uk in alt.sysadmin.recovery
