Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Neil Conway
Subject Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Date
Msg-id 87wuqdnz38.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
Re: revised patch for PL/PgSQL table functions
List pgsql-patches
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> This is an improved version of the PL/PgSQL table function patch.

Here's another improved patch. I got the parser to accept 'RETURN
NEXT' properly (thanks to Frank Ch. Eigler @ RH for his help),
although the solution might not be perfect: I changed the scanner to
accept 'return next' as a single token (allowing for a variable amount
of whitespace between the first and second words, of course). If you
have a better suggestion, let me know.

I also improved some unrelated areas of the documentation a little bit
and made some minor code cleanups.

I'd like to see this patch get into 7.3beta1 -- AFAIK, the only thing
remaining to be done is to write the docs. If I need to do anything
else, let me know.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

Attachment

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix disabled triggers with deferred constraints
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_attribute.attisinherited ?