Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Douglas McNaught <doug@mcnaught.org> writes:
>> Correct me if I'm wrong, but I've never heard of a 15kRPM SATA drive.
>
> Well, dollar for dollar you would get the best performance from slower drives
> anyways since it would give you more spindles. 15kRPM drives are *expensive*.
Depends on your power, heat and rack space budget too... If you need
max performance out of a given rack space (rather than max density),
SCSI is still the way to go. I'll definitely agree that SATA is
becoming much more of a player in the server storage market, though.
-Doug
