Re: @ versus ~, redux - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: @ versus ~, redux
Date
Msg-id 87veo326si.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: @ versus ~, redux  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: @ versus ~, redux  ("Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:

> Matteo Beccati <php@beccati.com> writes:
> 
> > Tom Lane ha scritto:
> > >
> > >     "x @< y" means "x is contained in y"
> >
> > ltree <@ ltree
> 
> If you consider ltree entries to be sets containing all their children then
> those sound consistent.

Oops, sorry for the noise.

-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: autoconf version for back branches?