Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> My memory is lousy at the best of times, but when have we had a minor
>> release that would have broken this due to changed format? OTOH, the
>> Primary and Backup servers need the same config settings (e.g.
>> --enable-integer-datetimes), architecture, compiler, etc, do they not?
>> Probably working from an identical set of binaries would be ideal.
>
> Not often, which is why I mention the possibility of having
> interoperating minor release levels at all. If it was common, I'd just
> put a blanket warning on doing that.
I don't know that it's happened in the past but I wouldn't be surprised.
Consider that the bug being fixed in the point release may well be a bug in
WAL log formatting.
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
