Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Date
Msg-id 87sl89e903.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-general
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

>> Fwiw even in the min/max/sum case the spec is moving away from having
>> aggregates ignore NULL values. You now get a warning in Oracle if your
>> aggregate includes any NULL inputs.
>
> How does Oracle's new behavior relate to the standard moving?

Sorry I noticed that editing error only after I sent it. I should have changed
that to say Oracle was moving in that direction. There's nothing of the sort
in SQL2003 that I can find.

--
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres