Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe" - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"
Date
Msg-id 87r7632nao.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle purchases Sleepycat - is this the "other shoe"  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Egad :-(.  At least the SQL spec has some notion of wanting the answer
> to a query to be well-defined ...

Yeah, the MySQL interpretation of this is basically as a shorter form of
Postgres's DISTINCT ON syntax. There's something to be said for MySQL's which
doesn't introduce an orthogonal syntax to GROUP BY with basically equivalent
meaning, but there's a lot to be said for having a syntax that you can't write
by accident as well.

--
greg

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: address matching and verification
Next
From: "Ken Winter"
Date:
Subject: Re: Does PG really lack a time zone for India?