"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> The source of the problem is the floating point arithmetic which is used to do
>> the individual steps in the long division.
>
> I don't think so. The ultimate source of the problem is that div_var
> can only report a finite number of digits.
In the case reported div_var was getting 70/70 = 0.99999. Which is really just
wrong. The only reason was because 1.0/70 isn't representable so (1.0/70) * 70
is slightly more than 1 which ... div_var really ought not have any trouble
representing an integer even in its finite number of digits.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
