Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> 2. The patch didn't touch the implicit-RTE code, which means that
>>
>> WITH q AS ( SELECT ... )
>> SELECT q.*
>>
>> will fail even if you've got add_missing_from enabled. I'm inclined
>> to think that this violates the principle of least surprise. On
>> the other hand, add_missing_from is certainly a legacy thing and maybe
>> we shouldn't bother expending any extra code to make it work with
>> new features. Thoughts?
>
> Yes, it's legacy. I wouldn't bother.
The results would be even more suprising if there *is* a table named "q"
though...
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication
support!
