Jim Nasby writes:
> On 11/27/16 2:01 AM, Amos Bird wrote:
>>
>>> I was thinking about introducing a new GUC, named something like
>>> default_index_tablespace, which would need to have at least these
>>> behaviors:
>>
>> Should we also consider the chidren tables as mentioned by Corey?
>
> Wouldn't point #2 handle that?
Hmm, does index tablespace also take care of child tables' tablespace? I
was thinking it only handles indexes.
regards,
Amos
