Tom Lane writes:
> I made the attached quick-hack patch, and found that check-world
> passes just fine with it. That's not complete proof that we have
> no other bugs of this ilk, but it definitely supports the idea
> that we don't really need to add the overhead. I'll just put this
> in the archives for possible future reference.
>
> (Or perhaps Andreas would like to try bashing on a copy with this
> installed.)
I certainly do :-). SQLsmith has been fuzzing for couple hours with the
patch applied, and so far none of the assertions fired. I'll leave the
patch on my fuzzing branch until merging becomes burdensome.
regards,
Andreas
