"scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com> writes:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > (Personally I think NATURAL JOIN is an evil, bug-prone construct,
> > precisely because coincidental matches of column names will mess up your
> > results.)
>
> Me too. When I first saw it, I figured it would "naturally join" the two
> tables on their fk/pk relation if there was one. That seems natural.
> Joining on two fields that just happen to have the same name is unnatural
> to me.
Well 99% of the time I impose on myself a constraint to only use the same name
iff they refer to the same attribute. So if they have the same name then they
really ought to be a reasonable join clause.
However the 1% are things like "date_created, date_updated" or even flags like
"active", "deleted" etc. Which are more than enough to make it utterly
useless.
Too bad really, it would be a handy thing for ad-hoc queries typed at psql. It
would still seem too fragile for production queries though.
--
greg
