Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Date
Msg-id 87ocfcnqmk.fsf@cbbrowne-laptop.afilias-int.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
swampler@noao.edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
> Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?

Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs.  Certainly it'll all be
significant to the performance focus.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com';
http://cbbrowne.com/info/internet.html
"MS  apparently now  has a  team dedicated  to tracking  problems with
Linux  and publicizing them.   I guess  eventually they'll  figure out
this back fires... ;)" -- William Burrow <aa126@DELETE.fan.nb.ca>

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "jgardner@jonathangardner.net"
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: B-Heaps