Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS
Date
Msg-id 87oaubo5nu.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Final Patch for GROUPING SETS  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Josh" == Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
Josh> (b) If we're going to discuss ripping out YAML format, pleaseJosh> let's do that as a *separate* patch and
discussion,

+infinity
>> Grouping Sets:>>   - ["two","four"]>>   - ["two"]>>   - []>> >> Would that be better? (It's not consistent with
otherYAML outputs>> like sort/group keys, but it's equally legal as far as I can tell>> and seems more readable.)
 
Josh> That works for me.

I prefer that one to any of the others I've come up with, so unless anyone
has a major objection, I'll go with it.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: removing volatile qualifiers from lwlock.c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes