Hi all,
while improving the technical documentation of my current project, I hit a SQL
statement that triggered a bug in my pg_query[1] based prettifier.
The statement in question was using '?' as param placeholders instead of the
'$n' style I'm used to: to my surprise the parser (pg_query uses the nice
standalone packaging of the PG parser provided by libpg_query[2]) accepted it
without problems, although emitting an AST that the prettifier was not able to
cope with.
Briefly:
$ diff -u <(echo 'SELECT * FROM foo WHERE bar = $1' | pgpp -t) \
<(echo 'SELECT * FROM foo WHERE bar = ?' | pgpp -t)
--- /dev/fd/63 2018-05-24 09:13:40.877301119 +0200
+++ /dev/fd/62 2018-05-24 09:13:40.877301119 +0200
@@ -56,8 +56,7 @@
],
"rexpr": {
"ParamRef": {
- "location": 30,
- "number": 1
+ "location": 30
}
}
}
While the fix to pg_query was trivial, to satisfy my own curiosity I looked
around to get evidence of whether the '?' style is officially accepted or
what.
The ParamRef documentation[3] does not mention that the "number" may be
"missing", and given that '?' is very difficult to search I failed to find a
definitive answer.
So the questions: is the '?' style placeholder a supported variant? and if so,
should the ParamRef doc tell something about that?
Thanks in advance,
ciao, lele.
[1] https://github.com/lelit/pg_query/
[2] https://github.com/lfittl/libpg_query
[3]
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h;h=6390f7e8c129e84607e1bb3c56ddd8578115f298;hb=HEAD#l243
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
lele@metapensiero.it | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
