Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs
Date
Msg-id 87mzrtcnat.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:

> Folks,
> 
> At OSDL we're seeing a wierd performance crash on 8.1cvs.   What's wierd about 
> it is that it doesn't happen all the time -- about 1 out of 4 test runs.    
> What it looks like happens sometimes is that performance drops dramatically 
> at the first checkpoint, and never comes back.  But there's oprofiles and 
> things to make a more insightful analysis:
> 
> 3 test runs exhibit it:
> http://khack.osdl.org/stp/301531/0.html
> http://khack.osdl.org/stp/301736/0.html
> http://khack.osdl.org/stp/301730/0.html

That dropoff at 60 minutes is the *first* checkpoint?! On an 80m test run?

That's a totally unrealistic configuration. Do you have any reason to think
the drop-off isn't just because all that pending i/o that you've postponed for
so long is finally having to get written out? Worse, it's forcing Postgres to
fsync files after 60m of i/o has been performed, flushing huge queues of i/o.

The benchmarks performed in this configuration are completely bogus. They
aren't including the time to checkpoint the last 20m of i/o, a quarter of all
the i/o in the test.

You really have to lower the checkpoint timeout to something realistic, like
5m or so. Otherwise these tests are just useless.


-- 
greg



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Wierd performance issue with 8.1cvs
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector