Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> That sounds okay. Also we might want to distinguish NaN from
> Infinity --- I would expect most people to want zero-divide to
> continue to get reported, for instance, even if they want to get
> Infinity for overflow.
Yeah, good point.
> This I disagree with. It would mean, for example, that you could not
> dump and reload columns containing such data unless you remembered to
> switch the variable first.
Hmmm... on reflection, you're probably correct.
Since that removes the potential objection to the previous patch, I've
applied it to CVS.
-Neil
