Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, I have applied the following patch that uses Cygwin native symlink()
> instead of the Win32 junctions. The reason for this is that Cygwin
> symlinks work on Win95/98/ME where junction points do not
Is this really a Win95/98/ME vs NT distinction or a FAT32 vs NTFS distinction?
In which case does an NT machine that happens to be using a FAT32 file system
have the same problem?
> and we have no way to know what system will be running the Cygwin binaries
Is there a reason to make this a compile-time decision? Can't it just try to
make a junction and if it fails then use the Cygwin symlink?
--
greg
